A reactive result in first test considered a preliminary positive, and means that HIV antibodies were found.” So what does it mean if the second test is negative? does it still considered a person to be hiv positive?? some people said that if the first test is positive means that HIV antibodies were found. what does (NATs) means by the way?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
does a reactive result in hiv test considered a person to be HIV positive?
Collapse
X
-
Hi Speedy,
If the confirmation test is negative, the patient does not have HIV. It means that the initial results were a false positive.
Do you mean NAAT? It refers to Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, or PCR.
Regards
-
oh i see , but i dont know why they usually mention naat as second confirmation test. no idea what that means? and how do you considered as confirmation test? i mean like what sort of test? for example what i did was a (ag-ab CLIA by Liaison XL) followed by (ag-ab EIA by biorad genscreen ultra) and then finally (western blot by MP Diagnostics)Last edited by speedy; 01-09-2021, 06:15 AM.
-
-
Hi speedy,
No it's simply known as the western blot.
It might be referring to testing HIV RNA Viral Load, as the technique is nucleic acid amplification or polymerase chain reaction
Regards
Comment
Comment